Connect With Us

#16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11

Source:
The Muckraker Report, June 6, 2006, and Ithaca Journal, June 29, 2006
Title: “FBI says, ‘No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11’”
Author: Ed Haas
http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html

Student Researcher: Bianca May and Morgan Ulery
Faculty Evaluator: Ben Frymer, Ph.D.

Osama bin Laden’s role in the events of September 11, 2001 is not mentioned on the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted” poster.
On June 5, 2006, author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask why, while claiming that bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 1998 bombings of US Embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the poster does not indicate that he is wanted in connection with the events of 9/11.
Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” Asked to explain the process, Tomb responded, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”
Haas pauses to ask the question, “If the US government does not have enough hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to ‘smoke him out of his cave?’” Through corporate media, the Bush administration told the American people that bin Laden was “Public Enemy Number One,” responsible for the deaths of nearly 3,000 people on September 11, 2001. The federal government claims to have invaded Afghanistan to “root out” bin Laden and the Taliban, yet nearly six years later, the FBI said that it had no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.
Though the world was to have been convinced by the December 2001 release of a bin Laden “confession video,” the Department of Defense issued a press release to accompany this video in which Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said, “There was no doubt of bin Laden’s responsibility for the 9/11 attacks even before the tape was discovered.”
In a CNN article regarding the bin Laden tape, then New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that “the tape removes any doubt that the US military campaign targeting bin Laden and his associates is more than justified.” Senator Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said, “The tape’s release is central to informing people in the outside world who don’t believe bin Laden was involved in the September 11 attacks.” Shelby went on to say “I don’t know how they can be in denial after they see this tape.”
Haas attempted to secure a reference to US government authentication of the bin Laden “confession video,” to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and US Congress, along with corporate media, presented the video as authentic. So why doesn’t the FBI view the “confession video” as hard evidence? After all, notes Haas, if the FBI is investigating a crime such as drug trafficking, and it discovers a video of members of a drug cartel openly talking about a successful distribution operation in the United States, that video would be presented to a federal grand jury. The participants identified in the video would be indicted. The video alone would serve as sufficient evidence to net a conviction in a federal court. So why, asks Haas, is the bin Laden “confession video” not carrying the same weight with the FBI?
Haas strongly suggests that we begin asking questions, “The fact that the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11 should be headline news around the world. The challenge to the reader is to find out why it is not. Why has the US media blindly read the government-provided 9/11 scripts, rather than investigate without passion, prejudice, or bias, the events of September 11, 2001?  Why has the US media blacklisted any guest that might speak of a government-sponsored 9/11 cover-up, rather than seeking out those people who have something to say about 9/11 that is contrary to the government’s account?” Haas continues. “Who is controlling the media message, and how is it that the FBI has no ‘hard evidence’ connecting Osama bin Laden to the events of September 11, 2001, while the US media has played the bin Laden-9/11 connection story for [six] years now as if it has conclusive evidence that bin Laden is responsible for the collapse of the twin towers, the Pentagon attack, and the demise of United Flight 93?”
UPDATE BY ED HAAS
On June 6, 2006 the Muckraker Report ran a piece by Ed Haas titled “FBI says, ‘No hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.’” Haas is the editor and a writer for the Muckraker Report. At the center of this article remains the authenticity and truthfulness of the videotape released by the federal government on December 13, 2001 in which it is reported that Osama bin Laden “confesses” to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The corporate media—television, radio, and newspapers—across the United States and the world repeated, virtually non-stop for a week after the videotape’s release, the government account of OBL “confessing.”
However, not one document has been released that demonstrates the authenticity of the videotape or that it even went through an authentication process. The Muckraker Report has submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to the FBI, CIA, Department of Defense, and CENTCOM requesting documentation that would demonstrate the authenticity of the videotape and the dates/circumstances in which the videotape was discovered. CENTCOM has yet to reply to the FOIA request. After losing an appeal, the FBI responded that no documents could be found responsive to the request. The Department of Defense referred the Muckraker Report to CENTCOM while also indicating that it had no documents responsive to the FOIA request either.
The CIA however claims that it can neither confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence of records responsive to the request. According to the CIA the fact of the existence or nonexistence of requested records is properly classified and is intelligence sources and methods information that is protected from disclosure by section 6 of the CIA Act of 1949, as amended. Therefore, the Agency has denied your request pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3).
Many people believe that if the videotape is authentic, it should be sufficient hard evidence for the FBI to connect bin Laden to 9/11. The Muckraker Report agrees. However, for the Department of Justice to indict bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks, something the government has yet to do, the videotape would have to be entered into evidence and subjected to additional scrutiny. This appears to be something the government wishes to avoid.
Some believe that the video is a fake. They refer to it as the “fat bin Laden”video. The Muckraker Report believes that while the videotape is indeed authentic, it was the result of an elaborate CIA sting operation. The Muckraker Report also believes that the reason why there is no documentation that demonstrates that the videotape went through an authenticity process is because the CIA knew it was authentic, they arranged the taping.
It is highly probable that the videotape was taped on September 26, 2001—before the US invaded Afghanistan.

  • ways to earn money fast October 20, 2010

    Hello, You obviously are someone who recognizes the energy of target and how to generate objectives that you just attain action by step.Bravo for you.In my individual lifestyle We’ve only noticed good results when I have kept my focus and manufactured the methods essential to achieve my ambitions – quite minor comes about by modify alone. This can be something I prefer to often share with my readers.Actually, I am delighted to learn about other peoples success as a result of laser like focus and you’ve got it.Continued achievement for you,David

  • lilbear68 February 4, 2011

    bin ladens dead and been dead for a while and the govts running out of ways to scare us into keeping this war goin on

    • Jeffthewrestler September 7, 2011

      well I shouldve have known you would post this! You can switch the letters in your name around to liberal68 .. So I can see why you’re dimwitted enough to believe our Govt. would “scare” us into thinking we need to continue the war.. Bin laden was behind 9/11.. plain and simple.. Go be a conspiracy theorist somewhere else

    • Jeffthewrestler September 7, 2011

      well I shouldve have known you would post this! You can switch the letters in your name around to liberal68 .. So I can see why you’re dimwitted enough to believe our Govt. would “scare” us into thinking we need to continue the war.. Bin laden was behind 9/11.. plain and simple.. Go be a conspiracy theorist somewhere else

      • Anonymous September 11, 2011

        Wow…  Actually it makes perfect sense for them to “scare” us like this.  First there was the collapse of the towers which fell in a vertical fashion, which any mathematician, engineer or physicist can tell you is impossible due to the fact that they fell in the path of most resistance instead of toppling over like a tree would.  Then there was the anthrax scare, which was found out to lead to a chemist’s lab, who was a US citizen.  When they went to his house he had already committed suicide…  Then there is a war in Iraq?  Because they had what?  WMD’s?  Where are they?  Why did we invade?

        Were they harboring terrorists?  Well yes; they were, and still are.  Just like every country does.  Do you even know what the CIA is.  They go to other countries to train people to be warriors/terrorists to fight against a ruling dictator/government just because the US doesn’t like them…  If that isn’t a terrorist organization, then I don’t know what is. 

        Wake up.  Do research.  Don’t listen to what is fed to you through the Fox news and the “liberal media.”  Instead, find sources that don’t have a bias toward our government.  There are plenty out there.  In fact,  just about every free nation has done a report with evidence they have concerning 9-11 and some of the things they found is quite disturbing…

        • AMERICANCAPITALIST December 1, 2011

          You are clearly no engineer. A tower with one impact point that is horizontal would have no likelihood to topple. It would fall straight down because of something called gravity. Go be a stupid liberal conspiracy theorist somewhere else.

          • wathapend2urfase December 1, 2011

            Actually it would topple.  It would topple from the impact point in the direction of the impact, so only the top 50 floors would have toppled from the rest of the building.  Imagine cutting a horizontal triangle in a tree 2/3s up a tree.  the top of the tree wouldn’t colapse into the rest of the tree it would topple over just like the towers should have done.  So instead of attacking me, prove me wrong.  if you understood gravity you would understand that it actually doesn’t pull things toward the earth it is actually the earth that has bent space around itself and objects are pushed towards the earth. 

            Imagine you have a cinder block standing vertcally and you created a miniature plane crash hitting it 2/3s the way up.  once it finishes wobbling I want you to press down as hard as you can on the block, hell even stand on it.  I guarentee that the bottom of the cinder block will never crumble underneath all of that weight.  I am 100% possitive that the top of the cinder block will fall off toward the side of the initial impact.

          • Aweraky January 26, 2012

            i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

          • Aweraky January 26, 2012

            i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

          • Aweraky January 26, 2012

            i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

          • Aweraky January 26, 2012

            i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

          • Aweraky January 26, 2012

            i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

          • Aweraky January 26, 2012

            i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

          • Aweraky January 26, 2012

            i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

        • Bnortz23 January 16, 2012

          Congratulations, Sir. You’ve just won the internet.

      • hugefan#1 January 9, 2012

        this dudes funny. i can tell he doesnt give a shit about either side he just enjoys tossing out a harmless joke in a volatile environment where it is sure to get an overreaction. props bro. mad props. i like your style
         

      • hugefan#1 January 9, 2012

        this dudes funny. i can tell he doesnt give a shit about either side he just enjoys tossing out a harmless joke in a volatile environment where it is sure to get an overreaction. props bro. mad props. i like your style
         

      • hugefan#1 January 9, 2012

        this dudes funny. i can tell he doesnt give a shit about either side he just enjoys tossing out a harmless joke in a volatile environment where it is sure to get an overreaction. props bro. mad props. i like your style
         

  • Terry Wagar February 7, 2011

    My wife was poisoning me and she recruited our daughters to lie for her!

    They no longer try to hide it from me they spent a couple years recruiting people to lie for them!

    Their bragging on audio death threats while their friends and relatives in law enforcement cover it up at the hospital!

    I was a plasma donor at the time and my family knew that, and they also knew my wife was poisoning me while she was having an affair!

    After most of my family moved out of our home my wife confessed in writing she use’s antifreeze as poison!

    My wife also confessed in her diary she is a poisoner of a plasma donor!

    I reported this to the plasma center in Portland Oregon and surrendered copies of my wife’s confessions and it appears they have covered it up!

    I have received death threats from family and from authority’s that gave them permission to do this to me!

    • guest September 7, 2011

      dude just move to another town

    • CMB551 January 19, 2012

      So are you trying to say that your wife has been Osama Bin Laden this entire time?

  • María Alicia García Facino May 2, 2011

    “NO DEJES PARA MAÑANA LO QUE PUEDAS DESHACER HOY” (OSAMA BIN LADEN)

  • the how to box May 16, 2011

    I have been looking for an article like this. thanks. It will sure help me write my collage paper about bin laden

    • Anonymous July 28, 2011

      I sincerely hope you did not mean “college” paper. Really, I weep for the next generation.

      • wolfie-selfrighteous July 29, 2011

        You weep for the next generation? In every generation there is a certain percentage of intelligent individuals and a percentage of not so intelligent individuals. Just because one person can’t spell college (yes it is pretty pathetic) doesn’t mean the rest of that generation is of the same intelligence. Basing a younger generations intelligence on a random comment on the internet is a complete hasty generalization. If your generation had the chance to use the internet at a younger age I guarantee there would have plenty of ridiculous and foolish posts. 

        • Celia Arichardson August 31, 2011

          the older generation that judges the younger one, forgets who taught them. 

          • Peter965 November 22, 2011

            Internet and mobile phones taught them, of course !!!!

        • Celia Arichardson August 31, 2011

          the older generation that judges the younger one, forgets who taught them. 

  • Oneil July 17, 2011

    The Muckraker Report, like some other semi-courageous patriots, can’t bring itself to admit the obvious fraud of the Bin Laden confession video. They are all fakes. One used a right-handed, jewelry wearing, dark skinned, broad faced Bin Laden stand in. The others used  a pretty convincing look-alike, but a faker, nonetheless. 9/11 was an inside job, with help from others, (non-Americans).  My fellow citizens seem too brainwashed, or proud, or embarrassed, or indifferent, or afraid to really react appropriately to this ongoing shame festival. An opportunity for brave, good men and women to use 9/11 as leverage to break wide open the    overarching evil of our age is being wasted. I recently gave new thought to the idea that our wars have killed off and, therefore, silenced many of our best men, men who, if alive, might have broken open the 9/11 charade long before now. Good luck, America .  The wealth transfers going on now, unabated, are ominous. Neither the Dems nor the GOP attempt any clean-up of the lawlessness in high places. The partisanship in D.C. must be a show, a fraud.

  • Derek August 29, 2011

    The more I find out the more  bin Laden looks like a perfect “scapegoat”.

  • Anonymous September 1, 2011

    First off Law Enforcement Never uses the term Hard evidence. It is a Hollywood term. Much like this paper.

  • Anonymous September 1, 2011

    First off Law Enforcement Never uses the term Hard evidence. It is a Hollywood term. Much like this paper.

  • ... September 2, 2011

    TOO bad he admitted to it… soo…

    • Nigger November 21, 2011

      look at the comment above you stupid ass.

  • Discusted September 2, 2011

    Are you a fool or did you forget bin Laden admitted to it?

    • Lgoodwill1 September 10, 2011

      Bin laden denied fault in two official ‘Al Queda’ gatherings. Then later took credit. Learn your facts, and I think you were trying for “Disgusted”. You fool.

      • Bassabath69 December 12, 2011

        i think you were trying for faggot mr Lgoodwill1

    • Lgoodwill1 September 10, 2011

      Bin laden denied fault in two official ‘Al Queda’ gatherings. Then later took credit. Learn your facts, and I think you were trying for “Disgusted”. You fool.

  • King September 3, 2011

    actually osama never admitted to doing it, he says that he didnt do it but supports whoever that did it.

  • Bstylin September 13, 2011

    While I do believe you have a valid point, you are attacking this the wrong way.  Instead of being blatantly persuasive,  which is oddly similar to our liberal media, why don’t you be objective and just give us the facts.  If the facts are strong enough, we may choose to agree with your theory. 

    Personally I find it an interesting point and reason for further research, but your voice comes across as a crazed conspiracy theorist… which may not be that far from the truth. 

    • Kytos2011 December 27, 2011

      News Articles are meant to be written persuasively. The whole point is to convince their readers to believe the stories side of the information. And aren’t we all crazed conspiracy theorists in some way? This is a very interesting article, however, and I wish you luck on your own research into the topic. =]

  • Bstylin September 13, 2011

    While I do believe you have a valid point, you are attacking this the wrong way.  Instead of being blatantly persuasive,  which is oddly similar to our liberal media, why don’t you be objective and just give us the facts.  If the facts are strong enough, we may choose to agree with your theory. 

    Personally I find it an interesting point and reason for further research, but your voice comes across as a crazed conspiracy theorist… which may not be that far from the truth. 

  • Shivy88 September 13, 2011

    Well the FBI had hard evidence connecting Al Qaeda to the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and Bin Laden was the leader of  of the terrorist organization. The organization itself was the threat, not Bin Laden. Bringing down Bin Laden would permeate the central leadership thus dismantling them. So yea they could never directly charge Bin Laden for the attacks but destroying Al Qaeda would be an accomplishment for national security. 

  • Andy November 15, 2011

    Everyone is talking about how Osama admitted to it. I say “so what”? Hundreds of terrorist groups released videos claiming they were the ones who organised the attacks. Just because we say it was Osama doesn’t make it so.

  • vedette November 21, 2011

    U.S. government is so sketchy….

  • Kit November 26, 2011

    OBL never admitted he did it but agrees and encouraged whoever did!..Open your eyes people because before you know it there will be coins placed upon them!

  • Bassabath69 December 12, 2011

    okay even with all the facts that this article shows, there is no reason why our own goverment would kill 3,000 individuals just to scare people, and besides weres the proof of this?
    o i saw it on a tv show on how there must have been bombs in the building
    just because there is lots of proof saying that bin laden did not knock down the towers you cant immediatyl jump to the conclusion that our own goverment did it
    there are other people in this world that strive for the destruction of others and many of them live in our own country

    • Anonymous December 17, 2011

      Google “Northwoods” that’ll get your interest.

  • Bassabath69 December 12, 2011

    okay even with all the facts that this article shows, there is no reason why our own goverment would kill 3,000 individuals just to scare people, and besides weres the proof of this?
    o i saw it on a tv show on how there must have been bombs in the building
    just because there is lots of proof saying that bin laden did not knock down the towers you cant immediatyl jump to the conclusion that our own goverment did it
    there are other people in this world that strive for the destruction of others and many of them live in our own country

    • Guest December 17, 2011

      Google “Northwoods” that’ll get your interest.

  • balls in yo face December 12, 2011

    your all gay as hell!
    who fucking cares just dont be a douche and move on

  • balls in yo face December 12, 2011

    your all gay as hell!
    who fucking cares just dont be a douche and move on

  • Fckosama December 16, 2011

    I don’t really care if osama was the cause of it, he still deserved to be hunted down on countless other charges

  • Fckosama December 16, 2011

    I don’t really care if osama was the cause of it, he still deserved to be hunted down on countless other charges

  • Anonymous December 17, 2011

    Communication among all depts. of crime investigation very bad due to wanting to be the best informed. WTC pilots trained in AZ flying school in Prescott and instructors inform FBI of student wanting to fly but not take off or land instructions; the FBI ignored the warning.

  • Guest December 17, 2011

    Communication among all depts. of crime investigation very bad due to wanting to be the best informed. WTC pilots trained in AZ flying school in Prescott and instructors inform FBI of student wanting to fly but not take off or land instructions; the FBI ignored the warning.

  • bigT December 21, 2011

    Fellow enthusiast,

    Continue you quest for the truth no matter who’s feelings it may hurt, nor strange path it may send you. I do hope this is not the first you are hearing of this single piece of evidence. If so, there is much more tangible evidence to be learned. The information is easily evident and it doesn’t stop @ 9/11 either. To distinguish the truth and unveil it from under lies isn’t easy and most will disapprove, yet we must stick together through the hard times if we are to ever make a change before it is too late.

  • bigT December 21, 2011

    Fellow enthusiast,

    Continue you quest for the truth no matter who’s feelings it may hurt, nor strange path it may send you. I do hope this is not the first you are hearing of this single piece of evidence. If so, there is much more tangible evidence to be learned. The information is easily evident and it doesn’t stop @ 9/11 either. To distinguish the truth and unveil it from under lies isn’t easy and most will disapprove, yet we must stick together through the hard times if we are to ever make a change before it is too late.

  • Sean P Sylvia January 17, 2012

    you americans who believe your government and mass media are dumb as hillbillies

    Good luck to your ****ed up country

    kthxbye

  • Sean P Sylvia January 17, 2012

    you americans who believe your government and mass media are dumb as hillbillies

    Good luck to your ****ed up country

    kthxbye

  • Jason Scimitar June 17, 2013

    The USA paid their operative Bin Laden to carry out their planned destruction on 9/11. The biggest proof is the FBI claimed bin Laden didn’t do it. Everything the FBI does is a frigging lie. What more proof do you need. After all bin Laden is a federal agent who was paid to deliver weapons in Afghanistan to defeat the USSR there.

  • AMERICANCAPITALIST December 1, 2011

    You are clearly no engineer. A tower with one impact point that is horizontal would have no likelihood to topple. It would fall straight down because of something called gravity. Go be a stupid liberal conspiracy theorist somewhere else.

  • Bnortz23 January 16, 2012

    Congratulations, Sir. You’ve just won the internet.

  • wathapend2urfase December 1, 2011

    Actually it would topple.  It would topple from the impact point in the direction of the impact, so only the top 50 floors would have toppled from the rest of the building.  Imagine cutting a horizontal triangle in a tree 2/3s up a tree.  the top of the tree wouldn’t colapse into the rest of the tree it would topple over just like the towers should have done.  So instead of attacking me, prove me wrong.  if you understood gravity you would understand that it actually doesn’t pull things toward the earth it is actually the earth that has bent space around itself and objects are pushed towards the earth. 

    Imagine you have a cinder block standing vertcally and you created a miniature plane crash hitting it 2/3s the way up.  once it finishes wobbling I want you to press down as hard as you can on the block, hell even stand on it.  I guarentee that the bottom of the cinder block will never crumble underneath all of that weight.  I am 100% possitive that the top of the cinder block will fall off toward the side of the initial impact.

  • Bassabath69 December 12, 2011

    i think you were trying for faggot mr Lgoodwill1

  • Kytos2011 December 27, 2011

    News Articles are meant to be written persuasively. The whole point is to convince their readers to believe the stories side of the information. And aren’t we all crazed conspiracy theorists in some way? This is a very interesting article, however, and I wish you luck on your own research into the topic. =]

  • hugefan#1 January 9, 2012

    this dudes funny. i can tell he doesnt give a shit about either side he just enjoys tossing out a harmless joke in a volatile environment where it is sure to get an overreaction. props bro. mad props. i like your style
     

Project Censored 2014
Do You Like What Project Censored Does?
Fighting Corporate Media and Censorship
If you agree with us that Project Censored is one of the most important non-profits—unique in its approach to fighting corporate media censorship and propaganda—then perhaps you will consider making a donation or becoming a monthly subscriber during our 2014 Spring Fund Drive

contribute-button