Connect With Us

“Project Censored is one of the organizations that we should listen to, to be assured that our newspapers and our broadcasting outlets are practicing thorough and ethical journalism.” —Walter Cronkite
“Most journalists in the United States believe the press here is free. That grand illusion only helps obscure the fact that, by and large, the US corporate press does not report what’s really going on, while tuning out, or laughing off, all those who try to do just that. Americans–now more than ever–need those outlets that do labor to report some truth. Project Censored is not just among the bravest, smartest, and most rigorous of those outlets, but the only one that’s wholly focused on those stories that the corporate press ignores, downplays, and/or distorts. This latest book is therefore a must read for anyone who cares about this country, its tottering economy, and–most important– what’s now left of its democracy.” –Mark Crispin Miller, author, professor of media ecology, New York University.
“For ages, I’ve dreamed of a United States where Project Censored isn’t necessary, where these crucial stories and defining issues are on the front page of the New York Times, the cover of Time, and in heavy rotation on CNN. That world still doesn’t exist, but we always have Project Censored’s yearly book to pull together the most important things the corporate media ignored, missed, or botched.” –Russ Kick, author of You Are Being Lied To, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and the New York Times bestselling series The Graphic Canon.
“Activist groups like Project Censored . . . are helping to build the media democracy movement. We have to challenge the powers that be and rebuild media from the bottom up.” —Amy Goodman
Buy it, read it, act on it. Our future depends on the knowledge this col-lection of suppressed stories allows us.” —San Diego Review
“Censored 2014 is a clarion call for truth telling. Not only does this volume highlight fearless speech in fateful times, it connect the dots between the key issues we face, lauds our whistleblowers and amplifies their voices, and shines light in the dark places of our government that most need exposure.” –Daniel Ellsberg, The Pentagon Papers
“[Censored] offers devastating evidence of the dumbing-down of main-stream news in America. . . . Required reading for broadcasters, journalists, and well-informed citizens.” —Los Angeles Times
“One of the most significant media research projects in the country.” —I. F. Stone
“Project Censored interrogates the present in the same way that Oliver Stone and I tried to interrogate the past in our Untold History of the United States. It not only shines a penetrating light on the American Empire and all its deadly, destructive, and deceitful actions, it does so at a time when the Obama administration is mounting a fierce effort to silence truth-tellers and whistleblowers. Project Censored provides the kind of fearless and honest journalism we so desperately need in these dangerous times.” —Peter Kuznick, professor of history, American University, and coauthor, with Oliver Stone, of The Untold History of the United States
“At a time when the need for independent journalism and for media outlets unaffiliated with and untainted by the government and corporate sponsors is greater than ever, Project Censored has created a context for reporting the complete truths in all matters that matter. . . . It is therefore left to us to find sources for information we can trust. . . . It is in this task that we are fortunate to have an ally like Project Cen-sored.” —Dahr Jamail
“[Censored] should be affixed to the bulletin boards in every newsroom in America. And, perhaps read aloud to a few publishers and television executives.” —Ralph Nader
“Hot news, cold truths, utterly uncensored.” —Greg Palast
“Project Censored brings to light some of the most important stories of the year that you never saw or heard about. This is your chance to find out what got buried.” –Diane Ravitch, author of The Death and Life of the Great American School System.
“In another home run for Project Censored, Censored 2013 shows how the American public has been bamboozled, snookered, and dumbed down by the corporate media. It is chock-full of ‘ah-ha’ moments where we understand just how we’ve been fleeced by banksters, stripped of our civil liberties, and blindly led down a path of never-ending war.” –Medea Benjamin, author of Drone Warfare, cofounder of Global Exchange and CODEPINK.
“The staff of Project Censored presents their annual compilation of the previous year’s 25 stories most overlooked by the mainstream media along with essays about censorship and its consequences. The stories include an 813% rise in hate and anti-government groups since 2008, human rights violations by the US Border Patrol, and Israeli doctors injecting Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without their consent. Other stories focus on the environment, like the effects of fracking and Monsantos GMO seeds. The writers point out misinformation and outright deception in the media, including CNN relegating factual accounts to the “opinion” section and the whitewashing of Margaret Thatcher’s career following her death in 2013, unlike Hugo Chavez, who was routinely disparaged in the coverage following his death. One essay deals with the proliferation of “Junk Food News,” in which “CNN and Fox News devoted more time to ‘Gangnam Style’ than the renewal of Uganda’s ‘Kill the Gays’ law.” Another explains common media manipulation tactics and outlines practices to becoming a more engaged, free-thinking news consumer or even citizen journalist. Rob Williams remarks on Hollywood’s “deep and abiding role as a popular propaganda provider” via Argo and Zero Dark Thirty. An expose on working conditions in Chinese Apple factories is brutal yet essential reading. This book is evident of Project Censored’s profoundly important work in educating readers on current events and the skills needed to be a critical thinker.” -Publisher’s Weekly said about Censored 2014 (Oct.)
“Those who read and support Project Censored are in the know.” —Cynthia McKinney
“Project Censored shines a spotlight on news that an informed public must have . . . a vital contribution to our democratic process.” —Rhoda H. Karpatkin, president, Consumer’s Union
“Project Censored continues to be an invaluable resource in exposing and highlighting shocking stories that are routinely minimized or ignored by the corporate media. The vital nature of this work is underscored by this year’s NSA leaks. The world needs more brave whistle blowers and independent journalists in the service of reclaiming democracy and challenging the abuse of power. Project Censored stands out for its commitment to such work.” —Deepa Kumar, author of Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire and associate professor of Media Studies and Middle Eastern Studies at Rutgers University

9. Human Rights Abuses Continue in Palestine

The Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa (HSRC) has released a study indicating that Israel is practicing both colonialism and apartheid in the occupied Palestinian territories. The HSRC commissioned an international team of scholars and practitioners of international public law from South Africa, the United Kingdom, Israel, and the West Bank to conduct the study.

Student Researchers:

  • Josette Canilao, Ashley Housley, Crystal Schreiner, and Ashlee Plouffe (Sonoma State University)
  • Nolan Higdon and Kajal Shahali (Diablo Valley College)

Faculty Evaluators:

  • Andrew Roth and Heather Smith (Sonoma State University)
  • Mickey Huff (Diablo Valley College)

The team found that Israel’s policy and practices violate the prohibition on colonialism, which the international community developed in the 1960s in response to the great decolonization struggles in Africa and Asia. Israel’s policy is demonstrably to fragment the West Bank and annex part of it permanently to Israel. Through these measures, Israel has denied the indigenous population the right to self-determination, and has indicated a clear intention to assume sovereignty over portions of its land and natural resources. The team also found that Israel’s laws and policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) fit the definition of apartheid in the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. Israeli law conveys privileges to Jewish settlers and disadvantages Palestinians in the same territory on the basis of their respective racial identities.

Jonathan Cook, writing for the Electronic Intifada—the nonprofit, independent news source covering issues stemming from Israel’s forty-year occupation of Palestinian territories—reported Israel’s restrictions on entry into the West Bank territory. Israel’s imposed restriction denies movement between Israel and the West Bank to people with foreign passports. This restriction affects Palestinian residents as well as humanitarian aid organizations. “The new regulation is in breach of Israel’s commitments under the Oslo accords to Western governments that their citizens would be given continued access to the Occupied Palestinian Territories.” Despite the breach, the US has not made any attempt to correct it. The US asserts it can do nothing about Israel’s restriction and, in fact, has raised no objections to it.

The restriction on entry for foreign passport holders deepens the isolation and separation Israel has imposed on the West Bank territory. The enforced regulation has created rifts and obstacles for Palestinians who have gone abroad, but settled in the West Bank territory. Thousands of Palestinians who have done this have been denied residency permits and are required to renew visas every three months in different regions. Palestinian resident Sam Bahour told reporters, “The latest rule change should be understood as one measure in a web of restrictions strangling normal Palestinian life that has been imposed by Israel, which controls the population registers for both Israelis and Palestinians.” Bahour further observes that this new regulation is another attempt to forward Israel’s goal to rid the territory of Palestinians.

Amnesty International has uncovered Israel’s monopoly on water in the occupied West Bank. The international human rights organization has accused Israel of denying Palestinians the right to adequate water access. Israel uses over 80 percent of the Mountain Aquifer, the only quality water source for populations in the West Bank. Though Israel has various other sources of water, it also uses the Mountain Aquifer and restricts access to it, leaving Palestinians to struggle with less than enough water. “Some 180,000 to 200,000 Palestinians living in rural communities have no access to running water and the Israeli army often prevents them from even collecting rainwater. In contrast, Israeli settlers, who live in the West Bank in violation of international law, have intensive-irrigation farms, lush gardens and swimming pools.” Many Palestinians suffer from lack of water access, subsequently adjusting their life to just subsist. Water restrictions imposed by Israel have affected Palestinian farmers, and the general way of life. “Restrictions imposed by Israel on the movement of people and goods in the OPT further compound the difficulties Palestinians face when trying to carry out water and sanitation projects, or even just to distribute small quantities of water.” Amnesty International has termed Israel’s water restrictions in the West Bank as “discriminatory policies” that deny basic human rights to Palestinians.

The Guardian has covered violence on Palestinians while they nonviolently protest Israeli occupation. Palestinian marchers devoted to nonviolent protest have fallen under abuse by the Israeli military, who claim the protesters created a “violent and illegal riot.” In an attempt to act on their concerns of occupation, Palestinians marched toward the West Bank barrier to display their opposition. On April 17, a Palestinian caught in the danger, Basem Abu Rahmeh, was a victim of the military violence and died by a tear gas canister to the chest. Another vicitim, American demonstrator Tristan Anderson, lost sight in his right eye and incurred debilitating brain damage when a tear gas canister hit him in the head. “The Bil`in [village in West Bank] demonstration was always intended to be nonviolent, although on Friday, as is often the case, there were half a dozen younger, angrier men lobbing stones at the soldiers with slingshots. The Israeli military, for its part, fires tear gas, stun grenades, rubber-coated bullets and sometimes live ammunition at the crowd.”

According to the Electronic Intifada, Harvard University fellow Martin Kramer, who is also a member of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), called for the West to stop providing pro-natal subsidies to Palestine, in order to curb the births of Palestinians. Kramer’s argument was that too many children lead to too many “superfluous young men” who then will become violent radicals. His views symbolize a genocidal measure. “The 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, created in the wake of the Nazi holocaust, defines genocide to include measures ‘intended to prevent births within’ a specific ‘national, ethnic, racial or religious group.’” Kramer’s view reflects a long-standing Israeli and Zionistic concern about the so-called “demographic threat” to Israel, as the Palestinians are soon to outnumber Jews in Israel and Palestine.

Sources:

Virginia Tilley, Human Sciences Research Council of South Africa, “Occupation, Colonialism, Apartheid,” HSRC Web site, May 2009, http://www.hsrc.ac.za/Media_Release-378.phtml.

Jonathan Cook, “Israel Brings Gaza Entry Restrictions to West Bank,” Electronic Intifada, August 18, 2009, http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10718.shtml.

Amnesty International, “Israel Rations Palestinians to Trickle of Water,” October 27, 2009, http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/israel-rations-palestinians-trickle-water-20091027.

Rory McCarthy, “Non-Violent Protests Against West Bank Barrier Turn Increasingly Dangerous,” Guardian, April 27, 2009, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/27/israel-security-barrier-protests.

Electronic Intifada, “Harvard Fellow Calls for Genocidal Measures to Curb Palestinian Births,” February 22, 2010, http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article11091.shtml.

  • Ali October 11, 2010

    Dear Friends,

    As I have been through all the website and have seen people commenting about issues such as US Dollar sinking, Way of Living in USA, Economy Crisis…Etc. No one talks about people dying all over the world. We all are busy in our life’s and do not want to look out for other people like neighbours, friends, relatives…Please think about the people living in palestine, they are human beings too, so just don’t take it easy when you hear about them. As you know if you neglect someone then you will be neglected by someone too…Remember that..

  • Anya Henly October 12, 2010

    WTH? That 2 year old boy from Indonesia that smokes forty cigarettes is OUT OF HIS MIND. Someone needs to punch his folks a few times, or just launch them into the ocean I saw the video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TOtoVEJSTU

  • IRENAUS CHINEDU October 13, 2010

    HELLO DIRECTING TO WORLD BANK MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS AUTHORITY. IS MY DUTY WITH MY NEWLY A POINT OFFICE OF OFFICE OF CEO WORLD PRESIDENT WITH PROFESSIONS I,AM SEEKING FOR SUPPORT OF WORLD BANK TO DEVOTED MORE INTRASTATE, EXAMINE EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON, WHITINGS AFGHANISTAN IRAG LOCAL GOVERNMENT SOME OF THE TAXIS PAID MOSTLY FOR BELLING OUT HAS TURNING TO BE USING AGAINST SUCH FALLOWED,DESTROYING INNOCENT SOULS LIFE’S, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT WERE INTO IT UP TILL TODAY . WHICH IS ONLY A STRANGERS CAN EVEN ATTEND TO ANY OF THEIR THOUGHTS , OUT THE THINGS I OBSERVED. OF THEIR CIVIL S SOCIETY MET HOED OF ABNORMAL PRACTICING. THAT TAKING THINGS BACK WARDS , TAKING ADVANTAGED ON OTHERS BEEN OUR MEMBERS. THAT IS THE PARTIAL OF SOME PRACTICING. KNOWN OF SUCH , CIVIL S SOCIETY WHICH HAS MADE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STATE COUNTRY NATURES HAS NOW TURNING TO SOME GROUPS BUSINESS USING IT TO MAKING MONEY AIM TO THEIR BUCKETS. BACKWARDS NAIVER FORWARDS EVER. AS EVERY OF THEIR SYSTEM OF USED SUCH OPPORTUNITY OF STUFFS OF A THINGS DUPING WORLD BANKS HAS ESPOUSED , EVERY OF THEIR STRUGGLING IS TO USED SUCH OPPORTUNITY FOR EACH STATE TO MAKE THEIR OWN MONEY . LIKE AS MAJORITY OF THEM SAYS IT MAY BE THEIR LAST CHANCE . THAT WARRANTED TREATING MY LIFE ON NECESSARY SAKE, TO KILL . THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IS AT HANDS AS OF NOW, I WAS POISON STROKE ORACLE TROUGH THEM IS THEM THAT WENT FEEDING PEOPLE UP WITH DIFF RENTS STORIES THAT HAS BEEN THEM SYSTEMS OF MAKI8NG MONEY, BANKS IS TOO BIG TO FELL I, MEAN THEIR JUST GROUPS OF FRAUDSTERS, THAT INVOLVED ON THIS MET HOED , TAKING PROGRESS OF WORLD SOCIETY AUTHORITY BACKWARDS, I REPEATED WHAT SO EVER THAT PURPOSELY MADE FOR ME SHOULD REMOVES OUT THEIR HANDS IMMEDIATELY ADDRESS WITH MY NAME AS THE LAWS DESERVED EVEN SINGLE PIN CANT EVER LEFT BEHIND, THAT PAID TROUGH FRENCH SOCIETY AFRICAN SOCIETY GROUPS REPRESENTATIVES, THANKS MR IRENAUS CHINEDU EARTHLY GROUPS. CONTACT NUMBERS +2347065673233. RIGHT AWAY IN EASTERN NIGERIA.

  • lasagna recipes December 21, 2010

    Hi, I just hopped over to your web page thru StumbleUpon. Not somthing I would normally read, but I enjoyed your views none the less. Thanks for making some thing worthy of reading.

  • Ariel Arielo April 18, 2011

    Israel is at war with palestine, or at least with hamas. It’s ridiculous to ask for equal rights with a country you are fighting.

  • Riley April 29, 2011

    Palestine is not a country, it’s an occupied territory of Israel. So yes, equal rights are a relevant issue.

  • nils11nz July 12, 2011

    Consider this:
    1.       It is probable that without the Ethnic Cleansing of the Arabs from their homes and
    villages in the 1940′s (531 villages and over 700,000 human
    beings expelled) there would be
    approximately equal numbers of Jews and Arabs in Israel today. (as is shown
    by the number of Arabs including the refugees and their descendants and the
    number of Jews in Israel, the West Bank and the Golan.) ie Basically, a Bi-National state would exist in Israel today.

     

    2.       That to
    create a “Jewish” state in Israel (defined where there is an 80% Jewish
    population) Ethnic Cleansing had to take
    place otherwise it would have ended up as a state that was approximately 50%
    Jewish and 50% Arab as the resident
    Arabs would not have vacated their homes/lands voluntarily.

     

    3.       That Plan
    Dalet (including: two years planning, 531 villages ethnically cleansed, over
    700,000 Arabs driven from their homes, 400 of those villages destroyed
    completely so that the Arabs had no homes to return to, 130 of those villages
    repopulated with Jews and the refusal to allow the expelled Arabs to return to
    their homes and villages) was the
    specific mechanism used by Israel to create the “Jewish State” of Israel in
    the 1940’s.

     

    4.       To
    maintain a Jewish state (defined
    where there is an 80% Jewish population), Israel
    has to deny the Arab refugees the right to return to their homes or lands. 

    Now. What resolution do the Arab Refugees deserve. What moral/ethical treatment do the deserve?  Do they deserve to go back to their homes/lands?

  • Anonymous July 12, 2011

    Consider this:
    1.       It is probable that without the Ethnic Cleansing of the Arabs from their homes and
    villages in the 1940′s (531 villages and over 700,000 human
    beings expelled) there would be
    approximately equal numbers of Jews and Arabs in Israel today. (as is shown
    by the number of Arabs including the refugees and their descendants and the
    number of Jews in Israel, the West Bank and the Golan.) ie Basically, a Bi-National state would exist in Israel today.

     

    2.       That to
    create a “Jewish” state in Israel (defined where there is an 80% Jewish
    population) Ethnic Cleansing had to take
    place otherwise it would have ended up as a state that was approximately 50%
    Jewish and 50% Arab as the resident
    Arabs would not have vacated their homes/lands voluntarily.

     

    3.       That Plan
    Dalet (including: two years planning, 531 villages ethnically cleansed, over
    700,000 Arabs driven from their homes, 400 of those villages destroyed
    completely so that the Arabs had no homes to return to, 130 of those villages
    repopulated with Jews and the refusal to allow the expelled Arabs to return to
    their homes and villages) was the
    specific mechanism used by Israel to create the “Jewish State” of Israel in
    the 1940’s.

     

    4.       To
    maintain a Jewish state (defined
    where there is an 80% Jewish population), Israel
    has to deny the Arab refugees the right to return to their homes or lands. 

    Now. What resolution do the Arab Refugees deserve. What moral/ethical treatment do the deserve?  Do they deserve to go back to their homes/lands?

  • Anonymous March 4, 2014

    I am glad that someone has recognized the situation going on in Palestine. In fact, it is worse than described on here. I am a Palestinian Arab although I was born in America. My grandpa and my great aunt moved here from Palestine. They told me the stories about what Jews did to them. They would bomb their neighborhoods, Jewish soldiers would come into homes with guns are say “Get out or die” At one point they came into a house with a pregnant women and she couldn’t run fast enough so they shot and killed her. Another time Jewish soldiers came into a Palestinian home and raped a women while her husband and kids were forced to watch. Jews tear gas Palestinians often at protests. They with hold water and everyday at 4 in the morning they blast Jewish prayers on giant speakers so our people couldn’t sleep. What we Palestinians have to fight with is rocks and sling shots. It’s very unfair that they have guns and tear gas and bombs while what Palestinians have is rocks and sling shots. This is the real story here people. We Americans do not hear much about it due to our affiliations with Israel. My mom, Grandpa, and Aunt have seen it first hand. I just think it’s sad that similar things happened to the Jews in WWII and yet they turn around and do almost the exact same things to the Palestinians. It is hardly a war. It is simply the Jews committing a Palestinian Pogrom.
    Sources: Real Life experiences

Project Censored 2014
Receive a Free Project Censored "Top 25 Censored Stories" Book For Being a Member
Become a $5 monthly subscriber to Project Censored and as long as you are a member, every year we will send you the newest Project Censored Top 25 Most Censored Stories of the Year book. You can choose paperback or e-book, you can cancel your monthly support at any time, and your support is tax deductible. 

Book, button, 3@2x