Comments on: #16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/ Media Democracy In Action Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:03:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Aweraky http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14335 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:02:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14335 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> By: Aweraky http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14334 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:01:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14334 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> By: Aweraky http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14333 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:00:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14333 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> By: Aweraky http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14332 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:57:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14332 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> By: Aweraky http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14331 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:56:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14331 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> By: Aweraky http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14330 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:52:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14330 i'm studying engineering right now....if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then 'go be a stupid liberal' open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled 'strengths of materials' hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn't hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down....if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side....think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls....you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn't collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something....and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner...no silly childish name calling please. i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

]]> By: Aweraky http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14329 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:50:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14329 i'm studying engineering right now....if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then 'go be a stupid liberal' open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled 'strengths of materials' hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn't hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down....if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side....think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls....you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn't collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something....and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner...no silly childish name calling please. i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

]]> By: CMB551 http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14282 CMB551 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:24:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14282 So are you trying to say that your wife has been Osama Bin Laden this entire time? So are you trying to say that your wife has been Osama Bin Laden this entire time?

]]> By: Sean P Sylvia http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14265 Sean P Sylvia Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:46:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14265 you americans who believe your government and mass media are dumb as hillbillies Good luck to your ****ed up country kthxbye you americans who believe your government and mass media are dumb as hillbillies

Good luck to your ****ed up country

kthxbye

]]> By: Bnortz23 http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14253 Bnortz23 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:57:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14253 Congratulations, Sir. You've just won the internet. Congratulations, Sir. You’ve just won the internet.

]]>