http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/ Media Democracy In Action Mon, 21 May 2012 05:16:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14687 Newly Disclosed Documents Shed More Light on Early Taliban Offers, Pakistan Role by Jeremy R. Hammond « Dandelion Salad Fri, 04 May 2012 00:08:07 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14687 [...] [27] “FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitive: Usama Bin Laden”, Federal Bureau of Investigation, accessed September 20, 2001 <http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm>. “No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11″, ProjectCensored.org, accessed September 20, 2001 <http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11...>. [...] [...] [27] “FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitive: Usama Bin Laden”, Federal Bureau of Investigation, accessed September 20, 2001 <http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm>. “No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11″, ProjectCensored.org, accessed September 20, 2001 <http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11…>. [...]

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14573 The Toronto hearings. 9/11 investigation. - Page 3 - SVTPerformance Sun, 01 Apr 2012 01:45:21 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14573 [...] was like 2004 or 2006 that they took him off the list. I cant find any links on google except this :#16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 | Project Censored ____________________________________ 1969 Mustang "Sportsroof V8" - bone stock 1997 [...] [...] was like 2004 or 2006 that they took him off the list. I cant find any links on google except this :#16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 | Project Censored ____________________________________ 1969 Mustang "Sportsroof V8" – bone stock 1997 [...]

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14335 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:02:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14335 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14334 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:01:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14334 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14333 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:00:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14333 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14332 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:57:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14332 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14331 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:56:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14331 i'm taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don't seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a 'normal force' of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states 'the sum of forces for 'F'=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer. i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14330 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:52:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14330 i'm studying engineering right now....if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then 'go be a stupid liberal' open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled 'strengths of materials' hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn't hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down....if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side....think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls....you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn't collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something....and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner...no silly childish name calling please. i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14329 Aweraky Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:50:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14329 i'm studying engineering right now....if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then 'go be a stupid liberal' open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled 'strengths of materials' hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn't hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down....if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side....think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls....you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn't collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something....and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner...no silly childish name calling please. i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

]]> http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/comment-page-2/#comment-14282 CMB551 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:24:00 +0000 http://www.projectcensored.org/?p=47#comment-14282 So are you trying to say that your wife has been Osama Bin Laden this entire time? So are you trying to say that your wife has been Osama Bin Laden this entire time?

]]>