#16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11

by Project Censored

Source:
The Muckraker Report, June 6, 2006, and Ithaca Journal, June 29, 2006
Title: “FBI says, ‘No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11’”
Author: Ed Haas
http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html

Student Researcher: Bianca May and Morgan Ulery
Faculty Evaluator: Ben Frymer, Ph.D.

Osama bin Laden’s role in the events of September 11, 2001 is not mentioned on the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted” poster.
On June 5, 2006, author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask why, while claiming that bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 1998 bombings of US Embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, the poster does not indicate that he is wanted in connection with the events of 9/11.
Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” Asked to explain the process, Tomb responded, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice then decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.”
Haas pauses to ask the question, “If the US government does not have enough hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to ‘smoke him out of his cave?’” Through corporate media, the Bush administration told the American people that bin Laden was “Public Enemy Number One,” responsible for the deaths of nearly 3,000 people on September 11, 2001. The federal government claims to have invaded Afghanistan to “root out” bin Laden and the Taliban, yet nearly six years later, the FBI said that it had no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.
Though the world was to have been convinced by the December 2001 release of a bin Laden “confession video,” the Department of Defense issued a press release to accompany this video in which Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said, “There was no doubt of bin Laden’s responsibility for the 9/11 attacks even before the tape was discovered.”
In a CNN article regarding the bin Laden tape, then New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that “the tape removes any doubt that the US military campaign targeting bin Laden and his associates is more than justified.” Senator Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said, “The tape’s release is central to informing people in the outside world who don’t believe bin Laden was involved in the September 11 attacks.” Shelby went on to say “I don’t know how they can be in denial after they see this tape.”
Haas attempted to secure a reference to US government authentication of the bin Laden “confession video,” to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and US Congress, along with corporate media, presented the video as authentic. So why doesn’t the FBI view the “confession video” as hard evidence? After all, notes Haas, if the FBI is investigating a crime such as drug trafficking, and it discovers a video of members of a drug cartel openly talking about a successful distribution operation in the United States, that video would be presented to a federal grand jury. The participants identified in the video would be indicted. The video alone would serve as sufficient evidence to net a conviction in a federal court. So why, asks Haas, is the bin Laden “confession video” not carrying the same weight with the FBI?
Haas strongly suggests that we begin asking questions, “The fact that the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11 should be headline news around the world. The challenge to the reader is to find out why it is not. Why has the US media blindly read the government-provided 9/11 scripts, rather than investigate without passion, prejudice, or bias, the events of September 11, 2001?  Why has the US media blacklisted any guest that might speak of a government-sponsored 9/11 cover-up, rather than seeking out those people who have something to say about 9/11 that is contrary to the government’s account?” Haas continues. “Who is controlling the media message, and how is it that the FBI has no ‘hard evidence’ connecting Osama bin Laden to the events of September 11, 2001, while the US media has played the bin Laden-9/11 connection story for [six] years now as if it has conclusive evidence that bin Laden is responsible for the collapse of the twin towers, the Pentagon attack, and the demise of United Flight 93?”
UPDATE BY ED HAAS
On June 6, 2006 the Muckraker Report ran a piece by Ed Haas titled “FBI says, ‘No hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.’” Haas is the editor and a writer for the Muckraker Report. At the center of this article remains the authenticity and truthfulness of the videotape released by the federal government on December 13, 2001 in which it is reported that Osama bin Laden “confesses” to the September 11, 2001 attacks. The corporate media—television, radio, and newspapers—across the United States and the world repeated, virtually non-stop for a week after the videotape’s release, the government account of OBL “confessing.”
However, not one document has been released that demonstrates the authenticity of the videotape or that it even went through an authentication process. The Muckraker Report has submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to the FBI, CIA, Department of Defense, and CENTCOM requesting documentation that would demonstrate the authenticity of the videotape and the dates/circumstances in which the videotape was discovered. CENTCOM has yet to reply to the FOIA request. After losing an appeal, the FBI responded that no documents could be found responsive to the request. The Department of Defense referred the Muckraker Report to CENTCOM while also indicating that it had no documents responsive to the FOIA request either.
The CIA however claims that it can neither confirm nor deny the existence or nonexistence of records responsive to the request. According to the CIA the fact of the existence or nonexistence of requested records is properly classified and is intelligence sources and methods information that is protected from disclosure by section 6 of the CIA Act of 1949, as amended. Therefore, the Agency has denied your request pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1) and (b)(3).
Many people believe that if the videotape is authentic, it should be sufficient hard evidence for the FBI to connect bin Laden to 9/11. The Muckraker Report agrees. However, for the Department of Justice to indict bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks, something the government has yet to do, the videotape would have to be entered into evidence and subjected to additional scrutiny. This appears to be something the government wishes to avoid.
Some believe that the video is a fake. They refer to it as the “fat bin Laden”video. The Muckraker Report believes that while the videotape is indeed authentic, it was the result of an elaborate CIA sting operation. The Muckraker Report also believes that the reason why there is no documentation that demonstrates that the videotape went through an authenticity process is because the CIA knew it was authentic, they arranged the taping.
It is highly probable that the videotape was taped on September 26, 2001—before the US invaded Afghanistan.

132 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
12 years ago

[…] evidence?  Where does that sound familiar?  Oh, yeah, like the lack of evidence that the FBI has linking bin Laden to September 11, 2001.  This of, course does, not get reported by the “fair and balanced” Sean Hannity and […]

trackback
12 years ago

[…] [27] “FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitive: Usama Bin Laden”, Federal Bureau of Investigation, accessed September 20, 2001 <http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm&gt;. “No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11″, ProjectCensored.org, accessed September 20, 2001 <https://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11…>. […]

ways to earn money fast
ways to earn money fast
11 years ago

Hello, You obviously are someone who recognizes the energy of target and how to generate objectives that you just attain action by step.Bravo for you.In my individual lifestyle We’ve only noticed good results when I have kept my focus and manufactured the methods essential to achieve my ambitions – quite minor comes about by modify alone. This can be something I prefer to often share with my readers.Actually, I am delighted to learn about other peoples success as a result of laser like focus and you’ve got it.Continued achievement for you,David

trackback
Noam Chomsky : Aucune preuve qu’al-Qaïda a perpétré les attentats du 11 Septembre | Comprendre le Monde | Histoire et faits marquants
11 years ago

[…] déclinèrent l’offre et au lieu de cela déclenchèrent la guerre. Et en 2006, l’agent du FBI Rex Tomb répondit au journaliste Ed Haas que le FBI n’avait toujours pas suffisamment de preuves […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] In other 9/11 related matters, there is the ongoing mystery regarding the whereabouts of the alleged perpetrator, Osama bin Laden. Even though bin Laden did not take credit for the incident (he in fact claimed the contrary, nor is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) holding him as a suspect in those crimes due to lack of evidence) government officials of both parties regularly refer to bin Laden as the one responsible for the 9/11 attacks (see story #16 in Censored 2008). […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] or planning the 9/11 attacks, yet he is still wanted “dead or alive” by our government in connection with that terrible […]

trackback
Palestine Think Tank » Analysis Counter-terrorism, No thanks! Somoud: Arab Voices of Resistance » Nima Shirazi – If Words Could Kill: Those Bloodthirsty Americans and Their Death Threat Duplicity
11 years ago

[…] in or planning the 9/11 attacks, yet he is still wanted "dead or alive" by our government in connection with that terrible […]

trackback
If Words Could Kill: Those Bloodthirsty Americans and Their Death Threat Duplicity | Sabbah Report
11 years ago

[…] in or planning the 9/11 attacks, yet he is still wanted "dead or alive" by our government in connection with that terrible act.Back in October, Jonah Goldberg expressed some doubts about the efficacy of […]

lilbear68
lilbear68
11 years ago

bin ladens dead and been dead for a while and the govts running out of ways to scare us into keeping this war goin on

Jeffthewrestler
Jeffthewrestler
Reply to  lilbear68
11 years ago

well I shouldve have known you would post this! You can switch the letters in your name around to liberal68 .. So I can see why you’re dimwitted enough to believe our Govt. would “scare” us into thinking we need to continue the war.. Bin laden was behind 9/11.. plain and simple.. Go be a conspiracy theorist somewhere else

Jeffthewrestler
Jeffthewrestler
Reply to  lilbear68
11 years ago

well I shouldve have known you would post this! You can switch the letters in your name around to liberal68 .. So I can see why you’re dimwitted enough to believe our Govt. would “scare” us into thinking we need to continue the war.. Bin laden was behind 9/11.. plain and simple.. Go be a conspiracy theorist somewhere else

Anonymous
Anonymous
Reply to  Jeffthewrestler
11 years ago

Wow…  Actually it makes perfect sense for them to “scare” us like this.  First there was the collapse of the towers which fell in a vertical fashion, which any mathematician, engineer or physicist can tell you is impossible due to the fact that they fell in the path of most resistance instead of toppling over like a tree would.  Then there was the anthrax scare, which was found out to lead to a chemist’s lab, who was a US citizen.  When they went to his house he had already committed suicide…  Then there is a war in Iraq?  Because they had what?  WMD’s?  Where are they?  Why did we invade?

Were they harboring terrorists?  Well yes; they were, and still are.  Just like every country does.  Do you even know what the CIA is.  They go to other countries to train people to be warriors/terrorists to fight against a ruling dictator/government just because the US doesn’t like them…  If that isn’t a terrorist organization, then I don’t know what is. 

Wake up.  Do research.  Don’t listen to what is fed to you through the Fox news and the “liberal media.”  Instead, find sources that don’t have a bias toward our government.  There are plenty out there.  In fact,  just about every free nation has done a report with evidence they have concerning 9-11 and some of the things they found is quite disturbing…

AMERICANCAPITALIST
AMERICANCAPITALIST
Reply to  Anonymous
10 years ago

You are clearly no engineer. A tower with one impact point that is horizontal would have no likelihood to topple. It would fall straight down because of something called gravity. Go be a stupid liberal conspiracy theorist somewhere else.

wathapend2urfase
wathapend2urfase
Reply to  AMERICANCAPITALIST
10 years ago

Actually it would topple.  It would topple from the impact point in the direction of the impact, so only the top 50 floors would have toppled from the rest of the building.  Imagine cutting a horizontal triangle in a tree 2/3s up a tree.  the top of the tree wouldn’t colapse into the rest of the tree it would topple over just like the towers should have done.  So instead of attacking me, prove me wrong.  if you understood gravity you would understand that it actually doesn’t pull things toward the earth it is actually the earth that has bent space around itself and objects are pushed towards the earth. 

Imagine you have a cinder block standing vertcally and you created a miniature plane crash hitting it 2/3s the way up.  once it finishes wobbling I want you to press down as hard as you can on the block, hell even stand on it.  I guarentee that the bottom of the cinder block will never crumble underneath all of that weight.  I am 100% possitive that the top of the cinder block will fall off toward the side of the initial impact.

Aweraky
Aweraky
Reply to  wathapend2urfase
10 years ago

i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

Aweraky
Aweraky
Reply to  wathapend2urfase
10 years ago

i’m studying engineering right now….if you want to make an argument about 911 not being an inside job, fine, we can have a discussion, but come back with a better argument then ‘go be a stupid liberal’ open up a book on classical physics. go take a class titled ‘strengths of materials’ hell, you can model the collapse of the towers easily enough on a computer. go do that and come back to me. the jet fuel wasn’t hot enough to slag the supporting steel. hypothetically, say it was somehow possible (thereby altering the laws of chemistry) and that the fire caused the collapse. why would it fall straight down….if a beam was weakened, and the towers fell, it would fall towards the damaged side….think of a tree being cut down, and when you make that last hit with the ax (or maul lol) the tree falls….you guessed it. Sideways! it doesn’t collapse in on itself and fall straight down like it was filled with explosives or something….and if you want to make a rebuttal on my argument, please feel free to so, but in an intelligent manner…no silly childish name calling please.

Aweraky
Aweraky
Reply to  AMERICANCAPITALIST
10 years ago

i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

Aweraky
Aweraky
Reply to  AMERICANCAPITALIST
10 years ago

i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

Aweraky
Aweraky
Reply to  AMERICANCAPITALIST
10 years ago

i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

Aweraky
Aweraky
Reply to  AMERICANCAPITALIST
10 years ago

i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

Aweraky
Aweraky
Reply to  AMERICANCAPITALIST
10 years ago

i’m taking the class engineering mechanics-statics right now. would you like me to explain to you about gravity? because you don’t seem to understand. see, you have the weight force pushing down on the earth. you have what is called a ‘normal force’ of the earth pushing back onto the building. without that force, the building would collapse by itself. there is an equation, that states ‘the sum of forces for ‘F’=0. what that states is that, if the forces are equal to 0, the system is at rest. if there is a force imbalance, then the system is in motion. since there was absolutely NO force from the y axis pushing down on the tower, then F=0 applies. so you have no y force imbalance, how do you get the building to collapse straight down? i would love to hear your answer.

Bnortz23
Bnortz23
Reply to  Anonymous
10 years ago

Congratulations, Sir. You’ve just won the internet.

hugefan#1
hugefan#1
Reply to  Jeffthewrestler
10 years ago

this dudes funny. i can tell he doesnt give a shit about either side he just enjoys tossing out a harmless joke in a volatile environment where it is sure to get an overreaction. props bro. mad props. i like your style
 

hugefan#1
hugefan#1
Reply to  Jeffthewrestler
10 years ago

this dudes funny. i can tell he doesnt give a shit about either side he just enjoys tossing out a harmless joke in a volatile environment where it is sure to get an overreaction. props bro. mad props. i like your style
 

hugefan#1
hugefan#1
Reply to  Jeffthewrestler
10 years ago

this dudes funny. i can tell he doesnt give a shit about either side he just enjoys tossing out a harmless joke in a volatile environment where it is sure to get an overreaction. props bro. mad props. i like your style
 

Terry Wagar
Terry Wagar
11 years ago

My wife was poisoning me and she recruited our daughters to lie for her!

They no longer try to hide it from me they spent a couple years recruiting people to lie for them!

Their bragging on audio death threats while their friends and relatives in law enforcement cover it up at the hospital!

I was a plasma donor at the time and my family knew that, and they also knew my wife was poisoning me while she was having an affair!

After most of my family moved out of our home my wife confessed in writing she use’s antifreeze as poison!

My wife also confessed in her diary she is a poisoner of a plasma donor!

I reported this to the plasma center in Portland Oregon and surrendered copies of my wife’s confessions and it appears they have covered it up!

I have received death threats from family and from authority’s that gave them permission to do this to me!

guest
guest
Reply to  Terry Wagar
11 years ago

dude just move to another town

CMB551
CMB551
Reply to  Terry Wagar
10 years ago

So are you trying to say that your wife has been Osama Bin Laden this entire time?

trackback
11 years ago

[…] political simulacrum. (Check out this manifesto.) The so-called Islamists (including the late, falsely-accused Bin Laden) like the majority of Muslims, generally view modernity and democracy positively – […]

trackback
FreeWestRadio.com » Blog Archive » They Hate Our Meaning: Explaining the West’s Suicidal Embrace of Islamophobia
11 years ago

[…] its political simulacrum. (Check out this manifesto.) The so-called Islamists (including the late, falsely-accused Bin Laden) like the majority of Muslims, generally view modernity and democracy positively – […]

trackback
The US Justice Department Lacks Evidence To Indict Bin Laden For 9/11 Attacks « Norcaltruth
11 years ago

[…] source:ICSD911  Text Source: Project Censored   July 22, […]

María Alicia García Facino
María Alicia García Facino
11 years ago

“NO DEJES PARA MAÑANA LO QUE PUEDAS DESHACER HOY” (OSAMA BIN LADEN)

trackback
Perspective on the reported death of Osama bin Laden | Poetic Justice
11 years ago

[…] Quick to capitalise on this outpouring of emotion, many news agencies are using language like “mastermind of the 11 September 2001 attacks” (Guardian, LA Times) despite the fact that his appearance on the FBI’s Most Wanted List bears no mention of September 11th, and according to a well-cited quote “the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11” (source) https://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11… […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] OBL has never been connected to anything related to the 9/11 tragedy. Don’t believe me? Here it is straight from the FBI’s […]

trackback
Disposal of 9/11 Evidence Continues: Bin Laden Body Dumped at Sea « Norcaltruth
11 years ago

[…] report is from 2006. The FBI still has “no evidence” directly linking Bin Laden to 9/11, and that begs the […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] there is “no hard evidence” that he had anything to do with […]

trackback
Destruction of 9/11 Evidence Continues; Bin Laden Body Dumped at Sea | Liberating Memes
11 years ago

[…] That report is from 2006. The FBI still has “no evidence” directly linking Bin Laden to 9/11 and that brings up the question, ” on what grounds was this operation ordered?” […]

trackback
9.11はアメリカ政府の内部犯行@国際29 | ニュースと世間の価値基準
11 years ago

[…] それより以前に、「オサマが9/11の真犯人だ」という確証が全然ない!https://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11…それはFBIのサイトで見ても歴然としていたことなんですが(9/11の言及、ゼロ!)、http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Osama Bin Laden didn’t have all that much to do with 9/11. Which of course is a repugnant view shared by those conspiracy theorists at the FBI: Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI responded, “The reason why 9/11 is not […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] thereof) tying bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks, see here.  Suffice it to say, the FBI says there is no “hard evidence” of bin Laden’s […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] report is from 2006. The FBI still has "no evidence" directly linking Bin Laden to 9/11 and that brings up […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] you’re gonna have to be better than the FBI. They couldn’t find anything. Really… look. In fact… their own wanted poster for him doesn’t even mention any airplane-related […]

trackback
Terrorist caught without any fanfare - Page 5 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
11 years ago

[…] FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. #16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 | Project Censored __________________ "An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject" "When […]

trackback
Definitive thread on who deserves credit for getting Bin Laden - Page 15 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
11 years ago

[…] FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. #16 No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 | Project Censored Here's his FBI wanted poster CAUTION Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, […]

the how to box
the how to box
11 years ago

I have been looking for an article like this. thanks. It will sure help me write my collage paper about bin laden

Anonymous
Anonymous
Reply to  the how to box
11 years ago

I sincerely hope you did not mean “college” paper. Really, I weep for the next generation.

wolfie-selfrighteous
wolfie-selfrighteous
Reply to  Anonymous
11 years ago

You weep for the next generation? In every generation there is a certain percentage of intelligent individuals and a percentage of not so intelligent individuals. Just because one person can’t spell college (yes it is pretty pathetic) doesn’t mean the rest of that generation is of the same intelligence. Basing a younger generations intelligence on a random comment on the internet is a complete hasty generalization. If your generation had the chance to use the internet at a younger age I guarantee there would have plenty of ridiculous and foolish posts. 

Celia Arichardson
Celia Arichardson
Reply to  wolfie-selfrighteous
11 years ago

the older generation that judges the younger one, forgets who taught them. 

Peter965
Peter965
Reply to  Celia Arichardson
10 years ago

Internet and mobile phones taught them, of course !!!!

Celia Arichardson
Celia Arichardson
Reply to  wolfie-selfrighteous
11 years ago

the older generation that judges the younger one, forgets who taught them. 

trackback
11 years ago

[…] Haas that the FBI did not include 9/11 on Bin Laden’s “most wanted” profile because there was no hard evidence connecting him to the […]

trackback
The Last Word On Osama bin Laden | infowars blog
11 years ago

[…] FBI did not incorporate 9/11 on bin Laden&#8217s &#8220most wanted&#8221 profile because there was no hard evidence connecting him to the […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] Haas that the FBI did not include 9/11 on bin Laden’s “most wanted” profile because there was no hard evidence connecting him to the […]

trackback
B’Man’s Patriot Watch: James Colbertt’s “The Last Word On Osama Bin Laden” « BuelahMan's Revolt
11 years ago

[…] Haas that the FBI did not include 9/11 on Bin Laden’s “most wanted” profile because there was no hard evidence connecting him to the […]

trackback
The Corbett Report: The Last Word on Osama Bin Laden | New World Order Blog
11 years ago

[…] that the FBI did not include 9/11 on Bin Laden’s “most wanted” pro­file because there was no hard evi­dence con­nect­ing him to […]

trackback
The Last Word on Osama Bin Laden | Sovereign Independent
11 years ago

[…] Haas that the FBI did not include 9/11 on Bin Laden’s “most wanted” profile because there was no hard evidence connecting him to the […]

trackback
U.S. Officially Drop all Charges Against Osama bin Laden, Still “No Evidence” for 9/11, Wars Continue Expanding at More than a Billion Dollars a Month « Norcaltruth
11 years ago

[…] author Ed Haas had noticed that the FBI web page for Bin Laden did not mention the attacks of 9/11. He called the FBI to find out more: On June 5, 2006, author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask […]

trackback
U.S. Officially Drop all Charges Against Osama bin Laden, Still “No Evidence” for 9/11, War Expansion Costing a $Billion-a-Month « Liberating Memes
11 years ago

[…] Ed Haas had noticed that the FBI web page for Bin Laden did not mention the attacks of 9/11. He called the FBI to find out more: On June 5, 2006, author Ed Haas contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation headquarters to ask […]

Oneil
Oneil
11 years ago

The Muckraker Report, like some other semi-courageous patriots, can’t bring itself to admit the obvious fraud of the Bin Laden confession video. They are all fakes. One used a right-handed, jewelry wearing, dark skinned, broad faced Bin Laden stand in. The others used  a pretty convincing look-alike, but a faker, nonetheless. 9/11 was an inside job, with help from others, (non-Americans).  My fellow citizens seem too brainwashed, or proud, or embarrassed, or indifferent, or afraid to really react appropriately to this ongoing shame festival. An opportunity for brave, good men and women to use 9/11 as leverage to break wide open the    overarching evil of our age is being wasted. I recently gave new thought to the idea that our wars have killed off and, therefore, silenced many of our best men, men who, if alive, might have broken open the 9/11 charade long before now. Good luck, America .  The wealth transfers going on now, unabated, are ominous. Neither the Dems nor the GOP attempt any clean-up of the lawlessness in high places. The partisanship in D.C. must be a show, a fraud.

Derek
Derek
11 years ago

The more I find out the more  bin Laden looks like a perfect “scapegoat”.

trackback
Wootton Bassett: 4 Years of Military Propaganda Comes To End - WideShut: Alternative News
11 years ago

[…] for 9/11, and the FBI admits that there is “no hard evidence” of his involvement. [5]. 15 out of the 19 alleged 9/11 hijackers were Saudi, not from […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
11 years ago

First off Law Enforcement Never uses the term Hard evidence. It is a Hollywood term. Much like this paper.

Sakura
Sakura
Reply to  Anonymous
10 years ago

what is the proper term?

Anonymous
Anonymous
11 years ago

First off Law Enforcement Never uses the term Hard evidence. It is a Hollywood term. Much like this paper.

...
...
11 years ago

TOO bad he admitted to it… soo…

Nigger
Nigger
Reply to  ...
10 years ago

look at the comment above you stupid ass.

Discusted
Discusted
11 years ago

Are you a fool or did you forget bin Laden admitted to it?

Lgoodwill1
Lgoodwill1
Reply to  Discusted
11 years ago

Bin laden denied fault in two official ‘Al Queda’ gatherings. Then later took credit. Learn your facts, and I think you were trying for “Disgusted”. You fool.

Bassabath69
Bassabath69
Reply to  Lgoodwill1
10 years ago

i think you were trying for faggot mr Lgoodwill1

Lgoodwill1
Lgoodwill1
Reply to  Discusted
11 years ago

Bin laden denied fault in two official ‘Al Queda’ gatherings. Then later took credit. Learn your facts, and I think you were trying for “Disgusted”. You fool.

King
King
11 years ago

actually osama never admitted to doing it, he says that he didnt do it but supports whoever that did it.

trackback
9/11: A Time For Truth « Losing Freedom
11 years ago

[…] why 9/11 was not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden’s most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidenceconnecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” said Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] why 9/11 was not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden’s most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” said Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] reason why 9/11 was not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden’s most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” said Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the […]

trackback
The 4th Media » 9/11: A Time for Truth
11 years ago

[…] reason why 9/11 was not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11," said Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the […]

trackback
11 years ago

[…] reason why 9/11 was not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden’s most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” said Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the […]

trackback
9/11: A Time For Truth « infowebstorm.com
11 years ago

[…] reason why 9/11 was not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden’s most wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidenceconnecting Bin Laden to 9/11,” said Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the […]